Are We the Consciousness of The Universe?

 

Are We the Consciousness of The Universe?

02-10-2024

Dr. Perry Daneshgari

 

Vibration plays a major role in the connectivity of the three dimensions of the 3D model. The parts of the universe and the matter as we know it, however, are still an unknown as far as their vibration and impact on the overall inanimate and animate environment.

Consciousness is one of those areas where vibration is only observed or understood at its molecular or atomic levels. The spaces between our brain nodes don’t seem to connect with vibrations between the nodes. It is almost comparable to the spaces in the universe between the galaxies and stars. As well as the spaces within the atom itself. This comparison arises a curious question about our role in the universe’s consciousness.

Let’s imagine for a moment that we are on one of the brain cells of a larger animate being and act as its consciousness. Will the inconsistencies in our understanding of the universe be explainable with the comparison of our role on this earth verses the role our consciousness plays in our brain?

In other words, “Is there a brain in the universe?”

If our mental model of the atoms and molecules can be compared with the solar system. Can we assume that the connectivity of the universe is like the connectivity of our brain. Does one atom of the brain know that it is thinking? Is each solar system of a galaxy just a small part of a brain of an intelligence that we are part of? Also, is our understating of the expansion of the universe simply a reflection of the growing of the universal container of our matter, like our body is the container of our brain? Will this explain the age of the universal being? Are the supernatural phenomenon people experience just a daily living of the universal being, which is dealing with its dreams, diseases, and other life events?

The 3D’s answer will be “Most Likely”. Can this approach explain dark matter and black energy?

Once the 3D’s existence has been proven mathematically, this aspect of its application can also be investigated.

Let’s make a quick comparison of our understanding of our world. Bohr’s model of the atom, like all scientific postulates, was built based on his sensory.  The Galilean model of the solar system overturned historical models, the same what that the Copenhagen interpretation changed Einstein’s model of quantum physics.  With this in mind, if we have used a concentric / solar system like model to conceive atomic movements, maybe we should reverse the thought experiment.  Perhaps the solar system and “life” on individual planets or beyond can be understood better if we use quantum physics.  For example, rather than planets “revolving around a star”, and human life as we know it depending on this model and understanding…perhaps “life” as an existence in space and time is a probabilistic and non-deterministic model similar to quantum physics.

Human activities show up similarly; since we’ve built the concept of “time” to measure cycles and patterns, our perception of how we should up to each other is linked to the concept of time and space.  Every Sunday I go to the airport to church….every February 14th is Valentine’s day…the Earth revolves around the sun every 365 days.  What if all of these events are like the probability of atomic states?

In other words, if the concentric/circular/time-based view of the atom is in question with Quantum Theory, should we extrapolate the same questions about the Solar System and universe overall?

 

To remind everyone about the three dimensions discussed please see below equation and graph or look at the earlier blogs.

 

L = ETk

Where:

L = Unit of Life

E = Energy = mc2

T = Speed of Thought

k= Proportionality factor

In this equation, the constants are speed of light (c) and speed of Though (T). Everything else can and will vary.

 


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can Third Dimension Explain Gravity

Image
Can Third Dimension Explain Gravity 02-13-2023 Dr. Perry Daneshgari      Gravity is the result of Mass-Energy dimension. Mass and energy will exchange along their axis. The space time is impacted by mass-energy dimension and is bent. Life-EM dimension is impacted by the other two dimensions. The combination of the three impacts results in the world as we know it. In other words, the gravity by itself would not exist if it wasn’t because of Space-Time dimension being impacted and EM-Life’s influence. If we take both EM-Life and Space-Time out, the gravity will disappear. Where these three dimensions meet, is the point of their singularity.  The dark matter and energy are the part of the universe which has not met the singularity to translate to the visible matter. It won’t have gravity. Gravity is the point of transfer between EM-L to visible universe. The other two dimensions exist without Mass-Energy dimension where gravity is non-existing in them.    To remind ever
Read more

Change Makers are in Line with the Universe and Third Dimension

    What we know about our universe today is the fact that it is constantly changing and expanding. This discovery was what Einstein called his biggest blunder of his life, when he tried to explain the universal constant away until it was proven that he was correct. So, the only constant in the universe is its change with the universal constant as its ratio or factor. Translating this behavior of the universe to humans, which are the reflection of our universe as we know it will look like this: Some people try all their lives to keep everything constant and avoid change. Some people thrive on change. In the change maker’s world, they are the ones that are constant. In the change fighter’s world, the surrounding stays constant but they have to change. Change makers give energy, while change fighters take energy. The givers control changes, while the takers are controlled by change.
Read more

Is Temperature a Human Thing 01-15-2024 Dr. Perry Daneshgari

Image
 I was reading about the maximum possible or theoretical Temperature. I came across the number, 142 nonillion kelvins (10 32  K.) in the link from Futurism; https://futurism.com/science-explained-hottest-possible-temperature You will come across this statement: “Theoretically, it is possible. But theory isn't necessarily what we observe in our physical reality. As such, it seems that the highest possible known temperature is 142 nonillion kelvins (10 32  K.). This is the highest temperature that we know of according to the standard model of particle physics, which is the physics that underlies and governs our universe. Beyond this, physics starts to breakdown. This is known as Planck Temperature. If you are wondering, the number looks a little like this: 142,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (that's a really big number). Ultimately, this can only come about when particles achieve what is known as  thermal equilibrium .” So, the logic of 3D will tell us
Read more