Inanimate to Animate

  Is Gravity a Human Thing Like Space & Time 04-19-2024 Dr. Perry Daneshgari      Is gravity a human thing like space and time? As far as I know, all our science has been developed based on our sensory and derivatives of it. We have used physics, math, and other science to validate, contradict or correct our sensory view of the physical world around us. We come, however, very short when we try to connect the inanimate to the animate word, since our sensory does not help us to connect the dots like it does in the inanimate word. Hence it is easy to conclude that the reason we don’t have the final theory of everything is due to the lack of our ability to sense and because of that explain the animate world around us. This boundary between animate and inanimate world, like many other boundary issues in the past can and will put the current understanding of the physical world in its right place. Just like it happened to the classical, thermodynamic, EMF, gravitational and q

  Are We the Consciousness of The Universe? 02-10-2024 Dr. Perry Daneshgari   Vibration plays a major role in the connectivity of the three dimensions of the 3D model. The parts of the universe and the matter as we know it, however, are still an unknown as far as their vibration and impact on the overall inanimate and animate environment. Consciousness is one of those areas where vibration is only observed or understood at its molecular or atomic levels. The spaces between our brain nodes don’t seem to connect with vibrations between the nodes. It is almost comparable to the spaces in the universe between the galaxies and stars. As well as the spaces within the atom itself. This comparison arises a curious question about our role in the universe’s consciousness. Let’s imagine for a moment that we are on one of the brain cells of a larger animate being and act as its consciousness. Will the inconsistencies in our understanding of the universe be explainable with the compar

 I was reading about the maximum possible or theoretical Temperature. I came across the number, 142 nonillion kelvins (10 32  K.) in the link from Futurism; https://futurism.com/science-explained-hottest-possible-temperature You will come across this statement: “Theoretically, it is possible. But theory isn't necessarily what we observe in our physical reality. As such, it seems that the highest possible known temperature is 142 nonillion kelvins (10 32  K.). This is the highest temperature that we know of according to the standard model of particle physics, which is the physics that underlies and governs our universe. Beyond this, physics starts to breakdown. This is known as Planck Temperature. If you are wondering, the number looks a little like this: 142,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (that's a really big number). Ultimately, this can only come about when particles achieve what is known as  thermal equilibrium .” So, the logic of 3D will tell us