Climate Change An Inanimate Reality or Animate Perception? 3rd Dimension Has an Answer

 

Climate Change

An Inanimate Reality or Animate Perception

3rd Dimension Has an Answer

7-29-22

Dr. Perry Daneshgari

 

If we take all the politics away from the issue of the climate change what we are left with are few facts that have very little historical validation for their support pro or against the impact of humans on the climate change.

So, what is it really? Is it an inanimate reality or is it our perception as animate beings? Here are few facts we know from the history, which by themselves can be disputed or agreed upon:

1.      Earth froze for few million years

2.      Earth was tropic for few million years

3.      Oceans and continents have come and gone

All this tell us, is that the inanimate world as we know it, has its own way of adjusting to its surroundings, with or without our animate input. We may NOT LIKE THE RESULTS, but it really doesn’t matter to earth if we like its hurricanes, tornadoes, blue skies, mountains, seas, thunderstorms etc. It deals with it as it sees it fit.

What we are missing, is the connection between inanimate and animate world and being able to predict the outcomes of the interactions of the two if they are really two different realities.

This issue is easily resolved by using the 3rd dimension description of the universe. The adjustment of the inanimate environment is a natural part of its growth in the Mass-Energy axis dimension and by using the connectivity factors described in the earlier write-ups to the Electromagnetic and Life axis dimension. We have to adjust our understanding of the vibration changes in the inanimate world of Mass-Energy and its impact on EM-Life dimension to be able to predict the real outcome of adjustments of the earth to its surroundings.

In other words, leave the earth alone and adjust our expectations about its adjustments to its life.

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Temperature a Human Thing 01-15-2024 Dr. Perry Daneshgari

Image
 I was reading about the maximum possible or theoretical Temperature. I came across the number, 142 nonillion kelvins (10 32  K.) in the link from Futurism; https://futurism.com/science-explained-hottest-possible-temperature You will come across this statement: “Theoretically, it is possible. But theory isn't necessarily what we observe in our physical reality. As such, it seems that the highest possible known temperature is 142 nonillion kelvins (10 32  K.). This is the highest temperature that we know of according to the standard model of particle physics, which is the physics that underlies and governs our universe. Beyond this, physics starts to breakdown. This is known as Planck Temperature. If you are wondering, the number looks a little like this: 142,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (that's a really big number). Ultimately, this can only come about when particles achieve what is known as  thermal equilibrium .” So, the logic of 3D wi...
Read more

Can Third Dimension Explain Gravity

Image
Can Third Dimension Explain Gravity 02-13-2023 Dr. Perry Daneshgari      Gravity is the result of Mass-Energy dimension. Mass and energy will exchange along their axis. The space time is impacted by mass-energy dimension and is bent. Life-EM dimension is impacted by the other two dimensions. The combination of the three impacts results in the world as we know it. In other words, the gravity by itself would not exist if it wasn’t because of Space-Time dimension being impacted and EM-Life’s influence. If we take both EM-Life and Space-Time out, the gravity will disappear. Where these three dimensions meet, is the point of their singularity.  The dark matter and energy are the part of the universe which has not met the singularity to translate to the visible matter. It won’t have gravity. Gravity is the point of transfer between EM-L to visible universe. The other two dimensions exist without Mass-Energy dimension where gravity is non-existing in them....
Read more

Laws of Physics and our sensory

Hi All: I have a thought about our understanding of the universe as we know it. I assume, that all of our understanding and discovery of laws of physics are an extension or related to our sensory. In other words, we measure what we sense and we can then extend it with other tools to help us measure extremes of our senses, such as infrared or ultraviolet. So, here is the question: Would the laws of physics be different or change if our sensory changes or was different? Please let me hear your thoughts. Thnaks Perry
Read more