Is Entropy really only one way?


Is Entropy really only one way?
Assumptions that anchor us

No one since James Clerk Maxwell has questioned the validity of concept of entropy. Naturally in a given frame the entropy is valid. However, in the Third-Dimension Theory, where the dimensions are independent of each other and the frames can be referenced to one or the other dimension the entropy seen in one dimension will not hold in the other. The energy losses due to entropy in one dimension or frame can still be useful and available energy in the different frame or dimension. Here is an example of how it can work even in one dimension with only frame change:
1.     Two state system of a coin head or tail doesn't take into account the transition state. It only drives it conclusion from the end state. Which then through the abstraction leads to other conclusions, which then leads to higher degrees of abstraction.
2.     Describing a system has to always include the observer and the measuring devices and methods
3.     The observer being part of the system cannot measure the entire system
4.     QM works with transitional stages of a process where deterministic classical mechanics works with beginning and end states
5.     QM uses the process to define lack of deterministic results of the outcome
6.     Quantum JPAC® =  Quanta of work performed

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Temperature a Human Thing 01-15-2024 Dr. Perry Daneshgari

Image
 I was reading about the maximum possible or theoretical Temperature. I came across the number, 142 nonillion kelvins (10 32  K.) in the link from Futurism; https://futurism.com/science-explained-hottest-possible-temperature You will come across this statement: “Theoretically, it is possible. But theory isn't necessarily what we observe in our physical reality. As such, it seems that the highest possible known temperature is 142 nonillion kelvins (10 32  K.). This is the highest temperature that we know of according to the standard model of particle physics, which is the physics that underlies and governs our universe. Beyond this, physics starts to breakdown. This is known as Planck Temperature. If you are wondering, the number looks a little like this: 142,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (that's a really big number). Ultimately, this can only come about when particles achieve what is known as  thermal equilibrium .” So, the logic of 3D wi...
Read more

Can Third Dimension Explain Gravity

Image
Can Third Dimension Explain Gravity 02-13-2023 Dr. Perry Daneshgari      Gravity is the result of Mass-Energy dimension. Mass and energy will exchange along their axis. The space time is impacted by mass-energy dimension and is bent. Life-EM dimension is impacted by the other two dimensions. The combination of the three impacts results in the world as we know it. In other words, the gravity by itself would not exist if it wasn’t because of Space-Time dimension being impacted and EM-Life’s influence. If we take both EM-Life and Space-Time out, the gravity will disappear. Where these three dimensions meet, is the point of their singularity.  The dark matter and energy are the part of the universe which has not met the singularity to translate to the visible matter. It won’t have gravity. Gravity is the point of transfer between EM-L to visible universe. The other two dimensions exist without Mass-Energy dimension where gravity is non-existing in them....
Read more

Laws of Physics and our sensory

Hi All: I have a thought about our understanding of the universe as we know it. I assume, that all of our understanding and discovery of laws of physics are an extension or related to our sensory. In other words, we measure what we sense and we can then extend it with other tools to help us measure extremes of our senses, such as infrared or ultraviolet. So, here is the question: Would the laws of physics be different or change if our sensory changes or was different? Please let me hear your thoughts. Thnaks Perry
Read more