Is Entropy really only one way?


Is Entropy really only one way?
Assumptions that anchor us

No one since James Clerk Maxwell has questioned the validity of concept of entropy. Naturally in a given frame the entropy is valid. However, in the Third-Dimension Theory, where the dimensions are independent of each other and the frames can be referenced to one or the other dimension the entropy seen in one dimension will not hold in the other. The energy losses due to entropy in one dimension or frame can still be useful and available energy in the different frame or dimension. Here is an example of how it can work even in one dimension with only frame change:
1.     Two state system of a coin head or tail doesn't take into account the transition state. It only drives it conclusion from the end state. Which then through the abstraction leads to other conclusions, which then leads to higher degrees of abstraction.
2.     Describing a system has to always include the observer and the measuring devices and methods
3.     The observer being part of the system cannot measure the entire system
4.     QM works with transitional stages of a process where deterministic classical mechanics works with beginning and end states
5.     QM uses the process to define lack of deterministic results of the outcome
6.     Quantum JPAC® =  Quanta of work performed

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Change Makers are in Line with the Universe and Third Dimension

Can Third Dimension Explain Gravity

Is Temperature a Human Thing 01-15-2024 Dr. Perry Daneshgari