Doers vs. Trackers
Another thought on third Dimension
Doers vs. Trackers
Sustainability of process vs. outcome and output
Throughput vs. activities
Procedure vs. outcome
The thought behind this question is:
"Why is there an organizational difference between the technical vs. procedural know how"
Examples for thinking about finding samples in nature:
- Engineer who designs parts vs. engineer who processes
- Electrician who installs vs. Prefab or PM assistant
- Process accuracy vs. outcome
- Procedure follow up vs. product
- Output vs. outcome
- Just get it done vs. get it done accurately constantly
- Abstract research vs. applied
- Academia vs. business
- Building vs. interior decoration
- Playing music in Titanic vs. rescuing people
- Engine room vs. serving dinner to the guests in A ship
In nature:
- River vs. it's bed
- Water flowing faster in the middle vs. zero velocity at the banks
- Plants vs. fruits. If fruits considered to be useful
- Food industry vs. entertainment industry
- Sky vs. clouds
- Energy vs. entropy, which entropy is itself energy in a different frame of view
- Sun vs. darkness
- Matter vs. antimatter
- Water vs. sunlight for plant growth
What does nature offer as a solution for this duality of participation in the outcome?
- We always need two independent variables to establish the state of a system. No variable is more important than the other
- Energy will diminished or explode if it is not used for work
- Is the duality a hint of third dimension? Soul vs. physical?
Comments
Post a Comment