Inanimate to Animate

Is Entropy really only one way? Assumptions that anchor us No one since James Clerk Maxwell has questioned the validity of concept of entropy. Naturally in a given frame the entropy is valid. However, in the Third-Dimension Theory, where the dimensions are independent of each other and the frames can be referenced to one or the other dimension the entropy seen in one dimension will not hold in the other. The energy losses due to entropy in one dimension or frame can still be useful and available energy in the different frame or dimension. Here is an example of how it can work even in one dimension with only frame change: 1.      Two state system of a coin head or tail doesn't take into account the transition state. It only drives it conclusion from the end state. Which then through the abstraction leads to other conclusions, which then leads to higher degrees of abstraction. 2.      Describing a system has to always include the obser...

The Third Dimension Missing Link Let’s start with the question of why Viruses exist. Their role on earth or life as far as I have read or understand, is to clean up the tired cells and mutate the existing cells to new form of life or stronger cells. Few questions and thoughts that if we can answer can bridge this behavior to the physics as we know it. What is the vibration frequency of the viruses? If we know or find out their frequency then we should be able to establish their frequency position in the spectrum of EMF and Life on the third dimension aches Once we establish the frequency spectrum position of viruses, can we also establish the transition between inanimate to animate?   Is Virus a link between biology and physics

What is the relationship between pictures and what we see and are? Take a look at the picture from Marilyn Monroe below.  What do you see? Would you know that this is not true if you have never seen a picture of her? Isn't that what we know about the universe as well? we just see, measure and interpret what is there now. When Maxwell tried to connect Newtonian Physics with his EMF, it failed. He was only able to move forward when he learned how to un-see with his mind, what his eyes would not let him believe. Where Einstein, was able to do that from the get go. Is lack of acceptance of the Third-Dimension due to the fact that we can's see how it works?

Uniqueness of Consciousness From Instinctive to Memorial to Historical Humans have a unique ability to record and most of the times learn from the history. Just like Pictures, Music, Language and Math the ability to record and learn seem to be unique to humans. Is there another thing in the nature that is parallel to that? We do this in our personal lives, tribes, companies, societies and countries. The steps we take in all forms of entities are: 1     1. Instinctive 2    2. Memorial 3    3. Historical The consciousness that leads us to this is the final form of matter, which is the result of what Dark Matter and Energy have produced. The only commonality among all these is the vibration of the media as an extension of the EMF. Our lives, Instincts, Memories and Histories are recorded in one form or another vibration. Can we find the connection to the Third Dimension?